Sweden’s famously generous social welfare system makes this a place not prone to fretting about automation — or much else, for that matter. Persson, 35, sits in front of four computer screens, one displaying the loader he steers as it lifts freshly blasted rock containing silver, zinc and lead. If he were down in the mine shaft operating the loader manually, he would be inhaling dust and exhaust fumes. Instead, he reclines in an office chair while using a joystick to control the machine. Sweden’s famously generous social welfare system makes this a place not prone to fretting about automation — or much else, for that matter. Persson, 35, sits in front of four computer screens, one displaying the loader he steers as it lifts freshly blasted rock containing silver, zinc and lead. If he were down in the mine shaft operating the loader manually, he would be inhaling dust and exhaust fumes. Instead, he reclines in an office chair while using a joystick to control the machine. “In Sweden, if you ask a union leader, ‘Are you afraid of new technology?’ they will answer, ‘No, I’m afraid of old technology,'” says the Swedish minister for employment and integration, Ylva Johansson. “The jobs disappear, and then we train people for new jobs. We won’t protect jobs. But we will protect workers.” Americans tend to dismiss Nordic countries as a realm of nanny-state-worshipping socialists in contrast to the swashbuckling capitalists who rule in places like Silicon Valley. But Sweden presents the possibility that, in an age of automation, innovation may be best advanced by maintaining ample cushions against failure. “A good safety net is good for entrepreneurship,” says Carl Melin, policy director at Futurion, a research institution in Stockholm. “If a project doesn’t succeed, you don’t have to go broke.” Eighty percent of Swedes express positive views about robots and artificial intelligence, according to a survey this year by the European Commission. By contrast, a survey by the Pew Research Center found that 72 percent of Americans were “worried” about a future in which robots and computers substitute for humans. In the United States, where most people depend on employers for health insurance, losing a job can trigger a descent to catastrophic depths. It makes workers reluctant to leave jobs to forge potentially more lucrative careers. It makes unions inclined to protect jobs above all else. Yet in Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia, governments provide health care along with free education. They pay generous unemployment benefits, while employers finance extensive job training programs. Unions generally embrace automation as a competitive advantage that makes jobs more secure.Making the United States more like Scandinavia would entail costs that collide with the tax-cutting fervor that has dominated American politics in recent decades.

参考答案:     瑞典的社会福利制度出了名的慷慨,这使得这里的人不大因为自动化而发愁。其他很多东西也一样。
    35岁的佩尔松坐在四个电脑屏幕前。其中一个显示的是他操作的那台装载机举起刚被炸开的含银、锌和铅的岩石的画面。如果下到矿井里手工操作装载机,他会吸入灰尘和废气。但现在,他靠在办公椅上,用操纵杆控制着机器。
    瑞典的社会福利制度出了名的慷慨,这使得这里的人不大因为自动化而发愁。其他很多东西也一样。
    35岁的佩尔松坐在四个电脑屏幕前。其中一个显示的是他操作的那台装载机举起刚被炸开的含银、锌和铅的岩石的画面。如果下到矿井里手工操作装载机,他会吸入灰尘和废气。但现在,他靠在办公椅上,用操纵杆控制着机器。
    “在瑞典,如果问工会领袖,‘你害怕新技术吗?’,他们会回答说,‘不怕,我害怕老技术,’”瑞典负责就业和一体化的大臣于尔娃·约翰松(Ylva Johansson)说。“工作岗位消失,然后我们会培训劳动者从事新岗位。我们不会保护工作岗位。但我们会保护劳动者。”
    美国人往往对北欧国家不屑一顾,认为那是一个由崇尚保姆式国家的社会主义者,而不是统治硅谷等地的传奇资本主义者构成的国度。但瑞典却展示了一种可能性:在自动化时代,最能推动创新的,也许是保持足够的缓冲应对失败。
    “完善的安全保障系统有利于创业,”设在斯德哥尔摩的研究机构Futurion的政策主任卡尔·梅林(Carl Melin)说。“如果项目不成功,你也不用破产。”
    欧盟委员会(European Commission)今年进行的一项调查显示,80%的瑞典人对机器人和人工智能持乐观态度。相比之下,皮尤研究中心(Pew Research Center)的一项调查发现,72%的美国人对机器人和电脑代替人类的未来感到“担忧”。
    在美国,大部分人依赖雇主提供医疗保险,失业可能会导致生活水平出现灾难性的下降。这导致劳动者不愿离开工作岗位,去建立可能更赚钱的事业,也让工会倾向于不顾一切地保护工作岗位。
    但在瑞典和斯堪的纳维亚半岛的其他地方,政府提供医疗保健服务和免费的教育。它们会发放高额失业救济金,同时雇主也会出资开展广泛的职业培训。工会往往认为自动化是一种竞争优势,会让工作岗位更安全。
    让美国更像斯堪的纳维亚半岛,会带来与近几十年来在美国政坛占主导地位的减税热情相矛盾的成本。
解题思路: >>>立即刷题