Robot arms weld a vehicle at the General Motors plant in Lansing, Michigan. Automakers are the biggest users of industrial robots, which have decreased employment and wages in local economies. Who is winning the race for jobs between robots and humans? Last year, two leading economists described a future in which humans come out ahead. But now they’ve declared a different winner: the robots. The industry most affected by automation is manufacturing. For every robot per thousand workers, up to six workers lost their jobs and wages fell by as much as three-fourths of a percent, according to a new paper by the economists, Daron Acemoglu of M.I.T. and Pascual Restrepo of Boston University. It appears to be the first study to quantify large, direct, negative effects of robots. The paper is all the more significant because the researchers, whose work is highly regarded in their field, had been more sanguine about the effect of technology on jobs. In a paper last year, they said it was likely that increased automation would create new, better jobs, so employment and wages would eventually return to their previous levels. Just as cranes replaced dockworkers but created related jobs for engineers and financiers, the theory goes, new technology has created new jobs for software developers and data analysts.

参考答案:     在密歇根州兰辛市的通用汽车制造工厂中,机械臂负责汽车的焊接工作。汽车制造商是工业机器人最大的使用者,导致了当地经济体中就业岗位和工资水平的下降。
在机器人和人类的就业岗位争夺战中,谁将胜出呢?去年,两位重量级经济学家对未来进行了预测,认为人类将会胜出。然而,他们现在却提出了一个截然不同的观点--机器人将会胜出。
    受自动化影响最深的行业是制造业。麻省理工大学的达伦•阿瑟莫谷鲁(Daron Acemoglu)和波士顿大学的帕斯库鲁•莱斯特伯(Pascual Resptrepo)两名经济学家新发表了一篇论文,其中指出一千名员工中每采用一台机器人,就有多达六人失业(每采用一台机器人,失业率就达到6‰),工资下降幅度高达0.75%。这似乎是第一个将机器人巨大而直接的负面影响进行量化的研究。
    参加本次研究的研究员都是各自领域中的资深人士,此前他们就技术对工作岗位的影响抱有更为乐观的态度,因此这些都说明了该论文具有更为重要的意义。在去年发表的一篇论文中,他们表示自动化程度提高可能会创造出新的、更好的工作,因此就业机会和工资最终都将回到之前的水平。
    按照他们的理论,正如当初起重机取代了码头工人的工作,但随之出现了工程师和金融家这样的工作一样,新技术已经创造出了软件开发和数据分析这样的新工作。
解题思路: >>>立即刷题